It’s a word we hear a lot in the news right now.
It means the ability of something to produce a desired effect.
An efficacy of 95% for a vaccine is outstanding. The vaccines on the way will help us leave our COVID cocoons and return to a normal life.
But this talk of efficacy got me to thinking about how we trick fish to bite our offerings of lures and flies. How do we measure the efficacy of a particular lure or fly? I think we can’t.
There is a thread on this forum right now about a particular jig. Other times there are threads about specific crankbaits, paddletails, spinners, etc. We have a good day with a lure or fly and we’re ready to claim it’s the best. But is it? On our next outing the bite might be slower. Was that due to the choice of our artificial bait, or was it due to the mood and/or scarcity of fish? Was it due to how we employed the bait, the way we retrieved it, the speed or depth we trolled it? I believe there are too many variables to know for sure.
I’ve come to the conclusion that there is no best lure or fly. Whatever works at the time in my opinion is the best. And I have seen on many occasions when multiple lures and flies work well on a giving day – much more so than the reverse situation.
I do believe the confidence and skill of the angler plays a role. But again, how to do you measure the efficacy of that? It's not just the number or size of fish you catch. If you’re confident in a particular lure and fly and use it more than another, how do you know another won’t work? I fall into that trap.
If two anglers in the same location are using different lures and getting different results that’s a good indicator that one lure is better than the other – at that particular moment. Or it could me that one angler is more skilled, more intuitive than another. It could be luck. I've seen each of those factors firsthand.
I look only for this: If a bait attracts the interest of fish that’s the first good sign. Most do. The second, is whether it hooks up and holds the catch long enough for me to touch it. A quality hook is indeed important. There is nothing I use that doesn’t accomplish those two things from name brand lures to homemade offerings. If they meet those two criteria, I keep using them.
So…I think lure makers and fly designers intend first to catch anglers with their offerings. I think the fish we chase in our kayaks are far less choosy about what we offer them. Driven by instinct and hunger, they see something flashing through the water and they chase it. They don't have time to examine the particular nuances of a jig, fly or whatever.
Just some random thoughts of a guy on grey day with his snow shovel presently poised for action.
It means the ability of something to produce a desired effect.
An efficacy of 95% for a vaccine is outstanding. The vaccines on the way will help us leave our COVID cocoons and return to a normal life.
But this talk of efficacy got me to thinking about how we trick fish to bite our offerings of lures and flies. How do we measure the efficacy of a particular lure or fly? I think we can’t.
There is a thread on this forum right now about a particular jig. Other times there are threads about specific crankbaits, paddletails, spinners, etc. We have a good day with a lure or fly and we’re ready to claim it’s the best. But is it? On our next outing the bite might be slower. Was that due to the choice of our artificial bait, or was it due to the mood and/or scarcity of fish? Was it due to how we employed the bait, the way we retrieved it, the speed or depth we trolled it? I believe there are too many variables to know for sure.
I’ve come to the conclusion that there is no best lure or fly. Whatever works at the time in my opinion is the best. And I have seen on many occasions when multiple lures and flies work well on a giving day – much more so than the reverse situation.
I do believe the confidence and skill of the angler plays a role. But again, how to do you measure the efficacy of that? It's not just the number or size of fish you catch. If you’re confident in a particular lure and fly and use it more than another, how do you know another won’t work? I fall into that trap.
If two anglers in the same location are using different lures and getting different results that’s a good indicator that one lure is better than the other – at that particular moment. Or it could me that one angler is more skilled, more intuitive than another. It could be luck. I've seen each of those factors firsthand.
I look only for this: If a bait attracts the interest of fish that’s the first good sign. Most do. The second, is whether it hooks up and holds the catch long enough for me to touch it. A quality hook is indeed important. There is nothing I use that doesn’t accomplish those two things from name brand lures to homemade offerings. If they meet those two criteria, I keep using them.
So…I think lure makers and fly designers intend first to catch anglers with their offerings. I think the fish we chase in our kayaks are far less choosy about what we offer them. Driven by instinct and hunger, they see something flashing through the water and they chase it. They don't have time to examine the particular nuances of a jig, fly or whatever.
Just some random thoughts of a guy on grey day with his snow shovel presently poised for action.
Comment